Proven Duty

What changes in a file when a client is flagged vulnerable: a concrete checklist

Flagging a client as vulnerable changes four things in the file. Each must be visible to a reviewer reading cold.

What the FCA says about adjusting for vulnerability

The Consumer Duty's expectations for vulnerable customers are not satisfied by the flag itself — the firm must respond to the characteristics identified and record the response. The FCA's Consumer Duty pages and the Consumer Duty publications library carry the guidance and the good-practice examples that show what that response looks like in a file.

The pattern in review findings is consistent: the flag is recorded but nothing else changes, or the changes happen and are never documented. This checklist closes both gaps in one pass.

The four adjustments

Worked example: one client, four changes

The same flagged client, two files. Anonymised and illustrative.

Before

The client was flagged vulnerable in one line. The file is otherwise unchanged — same recommendation, same standard charge, same review date, nothing recorded about communication or capacity.

After

Suitability evidence updated with the consideration and reasoning; communication adjusted (simpler wording, more time, a named contact); charges reviewed against capacity — fees spread over two quarters; reviews moved to quarterly with the next date recorded. Four changes, all visible in the file.

Common mistakes when a client is flagged

The file-change checklist

AreaWhat changes in the fileThe evidence
Suitability evidenceConsideration, outcome, reasoning recorded.A reviewer can follow the judgement.
CommunicationThe adjustment the driver calls for.The response, not just the label.
ChargesCost and value checked against capacity.Fair value is visible in the file.
ReviewsFrequency and next date adjusted.Monitoring continues beyond the flag.

Related reads

This checklist is the practical branch of the vulnerable customers hub. Write the adjustments with the one-paragraph documentation wording and keep the record live with the monitoring loop guide.

Frequently asked questions

Does flagging vulnerability always change the recommendation?

Not necessarily. The process changes first — communication, timing, charges, review frequency — and the recommendation only changes where the client's circumstances genuinely require it. Either way, the response is recorded.

Must every adjustment be documented?

Yes. An adjustment that exists only in conversation is invisible to a reviewer. The file must show the flag, the outcome, and the response — that is what makes the difference between a label and evidence.

Is a vulnerable client a compliance problem?

No. Vulnerability is a client circumstance, not a failing. The problem is an unrecorded one — a flag with no documented response reads the same as no flag at all.

Your next step

Take one flagged client and run the four adjustments through their file — evidence, communication, charges, reviews — and record each change. Start a free trial or see pricing.